University procurement teams, IT security leaders, and finance officers face a high-stakes decision when selecting payment processors. Digital transactions are ubiquitous on campus, from tuition payments to bookstore sales, making colleges prime targets for data breaches.
Ensuring PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) compliance is not just a regulatory checkbox – it’s essential for safeguarding student and institutional data and avoiding hefty fines or reputational damage. With PCI DSS 4.0 deadlines looming, choosing the right PCI-compliant payment solution is more critical than ever for higher education institutions. This guide will walk you through how to evaluate PCI compliance solutions for higher education and select a provider that fits your university’s needs.
Understanding the Stakes in Higher Ed Payments
Higher education presents unique challenges for payment security. Universities often have decentralized payment environments with multiple departments and campuses handling payments in various ways. The scope of PCI compliance can quickly become unwieldy across such a distributed system.
In our earlier post on why PCI compliance is critical for higher ed, we noted that universities handle countless transactions across many channels, each representing a potential vulnerability if not properly secured.
Non-compliance can lead to serious consequences – from fines and legal fees to erosion of trust among students and alumni.
One effective strategy is to partner with a PCI-compliant payments provider rather than managing everything in-house. Outsourcing payment processing to a Level 1 PCI-compliant third party can dramatically reduce your PCI scope and make it easier to maintain compliance.
As we discussed in our PCI audit readiness guide, working with external specialists or Qualified Security Assessors can streamline compliance efforts
Ultimately, the goal is to leverage a solution that keeps cardholder data secure and minimizes your institution’s risk exposure and workload. The following sections outline key criteria university decision-makers should consider when evaluating PCI-compliant payment solutions.
Key Criteria for Evaluating PCI-Compliant Payment Solutions
Selecting the right payment partner involves more than just comparing fees. You’ll want to perform due diligence across security, compatibility, support, and more. Below are the primary factors to weigh when vetting potential vendors or solutions:
1. PCI DSS Level 1 Certification and Security Standards
First and foremost, verify the provider’s PCI compliance credentials. Ideally, the vendor should be a PCI DSS Level 1 service provider, which is the highest level of compliance. Level 1 providers process over 300,000 card transactions annually and must undergo an annual on-site audit by a QSA, quarterly network scans, penetration tests, and maintain a rigorous security program
In practice, Level 1 certification is a strong indicator that the provider meets the industry’s toughest security requirements. “When choosing a payment provider, ensure security and compliance is a priority. Look for PCI DSS Level 1 certification as a measure of security for personal and payment information.”
This gives you confidence that the vendor handles card data in accordance with PCI’s 12 core requirements.
In addition to certification, inquire about specific security features the solution offers. Does the provider use point-to-point encryption (P2PE) or tokenization to protect card data? With P2PE, card data is immediately encrypted and never enters your university’s network, simplifying compliance and rendering data useless to hackers.
A fully PCI-compliant payment gateway should incorporate strong encryption and tokenization for maximum protection
Ask the vendor if they appear on Visa’s Global Registry of compliant service providers or can supply a recent Attestation of Compliance (AOC). In fact, require an up-to-date AOC or Report on Compliance (ROC) from each vendor candidate as proof of their PCI DSS validation. A reputable provider will have no issue sharing these documents. If a vendor is unwilling or unable to demonstrate their PCI compliance status, consider that a red flag and move on.
2. Integration with Campus Systems and Processes
Any solution you choose must play well with your existing campus infrastructure. Universities rely on a constellation of systems – student information systems (SIS), ERP/financial systems, learning management systems, dining and event systems, etc. – so your payment processor should seamlessly integrate with these. “Choose a partner with connected products that integrate with your ERP so your office isn’t maintaining multiple databases and manually updating student records.”
Deep integration means when a student pays a bill online, the transaction automatically reflects in the SIS/ERP without someone having to reconcile it by hand. This not only saves staff time but also reduces the chance of errors.
Look for solutions with pre-built integrations or APIs for popular higher ed software platforms (e.g. PeopleSoft, Ellucian Banner, Oracle/Workday finance systems, campus eCommerce platforms). The ability to connect multiple payment channels under one umbrella system is extremely valuable. With the right processor in place, universities can link all their payment touchpoints and ensure better reporting, easier reconciliation, and more streamlined workflows
In short, integration drives efficiency. It allows real-time updates between systems, eliminates duplicate data entry, and provides a unified view of payments campus-wide. During your evaluation, involve your IT team to assess how easily each vendor can hook into your architecture. The best solutions for higher ed will advertise compatibility with common campus systems and may have case studies or references from other universities attesting to successful integrations.
3. Robust Reporting and Reconciliation Capabilities
Effective reporting is a must-have for any payment solution in a complex university environment. Your finance and treasury teams need to monitor transactions across departments, reconcile accounts, and prepare for audits with ease. A good payment platform will offer a centralized reporting dashboard with on-demand access to all transaction data. This provides campus-wide visibility into payment system transactions and integrated reconciliation for financial accountability
Such transparency helps catch any discrepancies quickly and ensures nothing falls through the cracks as money flows in.
When comparing vendors, review the depth of their reporting tools. Can you easily break down transactions by department or payment location? Does the system support custom reports (e.g. daily summaries, exception reports, audit logs)? Are there features for automated reconciliation, where incoming payments are automatically matched to invoices or student accounts? Advanced solutions might even integrate with your general ledger or provide exportable data to your finance system, simplifying month-end close. Better reporting and easier reconciliation aren’t just operational perks; they directly support PCI compliance by giving you oversight of all card activity. For instance, if you can quickly generate reports of all credit card transactions and user access logs, you’ll be well-prepared when it’s time for the annual PCI audit or self-assessment. In short, prioritize vendors that make reporting intuitive and comprehensive – this will save your team countless hours and help maintain compliance continuously.
Empower Your Business
Drop us a line today!
4. User Training and Ease of Use
Even the most secure, feature-rich payment system can fall short if end-users don’t know how to use it properly. User training and system usability are key criteria often overlooked during vendor selection. Universities have a wide range of staff handling payments – from cashiers at the bookstore to administrators in the bursar’s office – and potentially students or part-time workers, all of whom must follow proper procedures. The chosen solution should be intuitive, with a minimal learning curve, and the vendor should support your team with thorough training resources.
Look for providers that offer onboarding training, documentation, and ongoing education for your staff. This might include live training sessions during implementation, how-to guides, video tutorials, and dedicated support to answer user questions. Some vendors even have certification programs or online learning portals to ensure your personnel stay up to date on the system and on PCI best practices. Remember, human error is a common cause of security breaches. Training reinforces the best practices that technology alone cannot – for example, reminding staff that card data must never be emailed or stored insecurely. In our post on PCI compliance best practices, we emphasized educating all staff and students who handle payments about proper procedures and fraud schemes. A good vendor becomes a partner in this effort by providing the necessary user training and easy-to-use interfaces that guide people to do the right thing.
During demos, pay attention to the user experience: Are screens and workflows logically designed? Can a new cashier be up and running quickly? Also ask about role-based access and user management – the system should allow you to enforce unique user IDs and strong passwords for each operator, which is a PCI requirement. Overall, choose a solution that your team will actually adopt enthusiastically. High usability combined with strong training support will lead to fewer mistakes and a smoother operation, which in turn helps maintain compliance day-to-day.
5. Cost Structure and Transparency
Budget considerations are always top of mind for procurement, but when it comes to payment solutions, it’s important to look at the total cost of ownership, not just the upfront price. Payment processors have varying fee structures – some charge a flat monthly or annual fee, others take a percentage of each transaction or a per-transaction fee, and many do a combination. There may also be costs for setup, equipment (if you need card reader devices), chargeback fees, fees for PCI compliance tools or audits, and so on. As you evaluate vendors, insist on a clear breakdown of their pricing model. Transparency is key: you should know exactly what you’ll be paying in gateway fees, merchant account fees, etc., and whether features like advanced reporting or training cost extra.
Be wary of quotes that seem too low, as they might not include all the elements you need. For example, a provider might offer low transaction fees but charge separately for things like reporting modules, customer support beyond basic levels, or annual PCI certification assistance. Those can add up. It’s often worth paying a bit more for a provider that bundles comprehensive support and security features into their service. Consider also the indirect costs of compliance – a slightly pricier solution that significantly reduces your PCI scope (and thus your internal compliance burden) could save money in the long run by shortening audits or avoiding the need to hire extra compliance staff. As one of our articles on the true cost of merchant services noted, getting a handle on all the costs that go into payments and PCI compliance is crucial to making an informed decision.
During vendor discussions, ask for references from other university clients to learn about any unexpected costs. Make sure the contract spells out who is responsible for PCI compliance fees (for instance, some payment processors assist with your annual SAQ at no charge, others might offer QSA audit support for a fee). The goal is to align the solution with your budget without sacrificing critical features. By doing a side-by-side cost comparison that accounts for both fees and value delivered, you can choose a solution with a sustainable cost structure that meets your financial constraints and compliance needs.
6. Vendor Support and PCI Expertise
When you choose a payment solution, you are also choosing a partner. The level of support and expertise the vendor provides should heavily influence your decision. Universities operate almost around the clock, and payment issues can’t always wait until the next business day – especially if they affect students or donors. Look for a vendor with a strong reputation for customer support, ideally 24/7 support for critical issues. “Your payment provider should be a partner that shares the mission of your institution... Choose to work with payment experts in the higher education space that will provide solutions tailored to your needs.”
In short, the provider should understand the unique challenges of campus environments and be committed to your success.
Key things to evaluate include: Support availability (hours of operation, guaranteed response times, dedicated account manager vs. general support line), escalation procedures for urgent security incidents, and the vendor’s track record with clients. During your RFP or demo process, note how responsive and knowledgeable the vendor’s representatives are – this often reflects the support culture you’ll experience later. Because PCI compliance is an ongoing effort, it’s extremely valuable if the vendor has PCI expertise on staff. Many higher ed-focused payment companies offer advisory services or at least guidance to help you through PCI assessments. They might, for example, assist with filling out your annual SAQ (Self-Assessment Questionnaire) or preparing for a QSA audit by providing all necessary documentation. Some even proactively notify you of PCI DSS updates (like new requirements in version 4.0) and help ensure your configuration remains compliant. This kind of partnership can make maintaining compliance much easier over time.
Don’t hesitate to ask a prospective vendor specific questions about how they handle PCI requirements. For instance: Will they contractually commit to maintaining PCI DSS compliance for their services? (They should.) How do they stay current with changes to the standards? Can they provide guidance if a compliance issue arises on campus? A strong vendor will have good answers, whereas a weaker one might only fulfill the bare minimum. Remember that maintaining PCI compliance is a shared responsibility – while you as the merchant have ultimate accountability, a quality vendor will shoulder much of the burden by keeping their systems secure, validating compliance annually, and supporting your team’s efforts. Choose a provider that will be an active ally in your security and compliance journey, not just a technology supplier.
7. Ease of Ongoing Compliance Maintenance
Finally, consider how each solution will impact your ability to maintain PCI compliance year after year. This criterion is really the culmination of the previous points – the right solution should reduce complexity and provide tools to help you remain compliant with less effort. A few aspects to look at here include:
- Scope Reduction: Does the solution significantly reduce the amount of cardholder data your university handles or stores? For example, a payment gateway that keeps card data off your servers (via encryption/tokenization) can shrink your PCI scope from dozens of systems to just the single system that touches the data.
Less scope means fewer requirements for you to manage. In a fictional scenario by PayPal, routing payments through an external provider eliminated the institution’s handling of card data and “helped reduce PCI DSS scope – and may help the institution reduce the costs of compliance”
paypalobjects.com
Aim for solutions that let you delegate the hardest security tasks to the provider. - Compliance Documentation & Updates: As mentioned, ensure the vendor will supply attestation documents (AOC/ROC) at least annually.
It’s even better if they have a portal or mechanism for you to monitor their compliance status continuously. Also find out how they handle PCI DSS version updates. With PCI DSS 4.0 introducing new requirements and a push for continuous compliance monitoring, your vendor should already be working on meeting those new standards. They should ideally provide software updates or configuration changes to you as needed to remain compliant. If a vendor has a history of lapses or late compliance (e.g., they didn’t update their systems until after a regulation deadline), that’s a concern. - Contractual Clarity: Make sure the division of PCI responsibilities between your institution and the provider is clearly documented. The PCI Council recommends formally identifying which requirements apply to third-party service providers and ensuring those are covered in agreements.
For instance, if the vendor manages your payment website, your contract might stipulate that the vendor is responsible for requirements like firewall maintenance, secure development practices, and so on for that environment. This clarity will make it easier to maintain compliance because each party knows their duties. It also provides recourse if something goes wrong on the vendor’s side.arrowpayments.com - Incident Response Support: In the unfortunate event of a data breach or suspected card data incident, will the vendor assist you? Consider asking if the provider has a breach response plan that involves notifying your institution and helping with investigations.
Some providers even carry cyber insurance to cover certain breach-related costs on your behalf
While you hope to never need this, knowing the vendor has your back contributes to long-term peace of mind.
Ultimately, the easier a solution makes it to “complete audits with ease” and stay compliant, the more it will reduce headaches for your team. Choose a payment solution that not only checks the compliance box today but also simplifies the ongoing work of security monitoring, staff training, and documentation tomorrow. This strategic fit will pay dividends as standards evolve and your campus expands its payment offerings.
Empower Your Business
Drop us a line today!
Scenario: How Fictional State University Chose Their PCI Solution
To see these criteria in action, let’s look at a hypothetical scenario. Fictional State University (FSU) is a mid-sized institution with about 20,000 students. FSU’s finance and IT teams realized they needed a more secure, unified payment system after a minor cardholder data scare in the alumni office. The CIO formed a committee with members from IT security, the bursar’s office, and procurement to evaluate new payment solutions. Their goals were to improve security, streamline reconciliation, ensure PCI compliance, and integrate with the university’s existing systems (an Ellucian student system and PeopleSoft finance system).
Initial Research: The committee first identified key requirements. They knew a Level 1 PCI DSS certified provider was non-negotiable for security assurance. Integration with Ellucian and PeopleSoft was also critical, as was having robust reporting to monitor all departmental transactions. They noted the need for tokenization to keep card data off campus, and wanted a vendor that would provide staff training and 24/7 support. Cost was important, but they were willing to invest a bit more for value. Using a vendor selection checklist (like the one at the end of this article), they compiled a list of must-have features.
Vendor Shortlist: FSU considered two finalists – let’s call them Vendor A and Vendor B. Vendor A was a well-known general payment processor used by many businesses; Vendor B specialized in higher education payments. Here’s how they stacked up:
- PCI Compliance: Both Vendor A and Vendor B claimed PCI Level 1 compliance. FSU asked for documentation; Vendor B promptly provided a current Attestation of Compliance, whereas Vendor A provided a dated PCI certificate summary. This signaled Vendor B’s transparency in security.
- Integration: Vendor A offered a basic API, but no out-of-the-box integration with Ellucian or PeopleSoft (FSU’s developers would have to do custom work). Vendor B, on the other hand, had proven integrations with the exact systems FSU used – including references from another university where it was integrated successfully. Vendor B even demonstrated how a tuition payment instantly appeared in the student account record during their demo.
- Reporting: In demos, Vendor A’s portal showed standard reports but lacked a way to segment by department easily; data from all campus units would be mixed together, requiring manual filtering. Vendor B’s solution featured a multi-department dashboard – FSU could view reports by department or consolidated, and it even had a reconciliation tool to tie daily deposits to each unit’s accounts. This would help FSU “ensure better reporting and easier reconciliation” as intended.
transactcampus.com
- Training & Ease of Use: Vendor A’s interface was relatively user-friendly, but Vendor B’s interface was built with university cashiers in mind, using terminology and workflows familiar to higher ed. Additionally, Vendor B included on-site training for FSU staff as part of their package and offered free quarterly webinars on compliance best practices. Vendor A had documentation but no formal training program for clients. Given FSU’s various departmental users (some of whom turn over frequently), Vendor B’s training and higher ed focus was a big plus.
- Support: Vendor A provided standard business-hours support with an upgrade option for 24/7 support at additional cost. Vendor B included 24/7 phone support in its base fee, with a guaranteed 1-hour response on critical issues. FSU’s team spoke with a reference client of Vendor B who praised their hands-on support during a recent PCI audit. This gave FSU confidence that Vendor B truly acted as a partner.
- Cost: Vendor A’s proposal had a lower transaction fee and a slightly lower annual subscription cost than Vendor B’s. However, once FSU factored in the extra costs for integration development, the optional support upgrade, and potential consultant help for PCI compliance (which Vendor A did not provide but Vendor B did), the difference narrowed. Vendor B’s pricing was a flat rate with no surprise add-ons, and they emphasized the included value (integration, training, support) that would save FSU money indirectly. The committee calculated the “soft costs” of each option over five years – including labor saved from easier reconciliation and fewer compliance headaches – and that analysis favored Vendor B.
The Decision: After scoring both vendors on each criterion, FSU’s committee chose Vendor B. The deciding factors were Vendor B’s deep higher-ed integration capabilities, its comprehensive support and training (critical for long-term compliance confidence), and a strong track record of PCI compliance evidenced by proper documentation and client testimonials. While Vendor A was a solid general-purpose solution, Vendor B’s offering aligned more closely with the university’s specific needs and reduced uncertainty in maintaining compliance. The slight premium in cost was justified by the reduced risk and internal effort. FSU’s CFO and CIO were persuaded by the argument that investing in a truly compliant solution now would prevent costly issues later.
Post-Implementation: In the first year of using Vendor B’s system, FSU successfully navigated a PCI self-assessment with substantially less stress. The vendor’s pre-filled SAQ documentation and responsive support team meant FSU’s staff spent significantly less time on compliance paperwork. Daily reconciliation across all campuses became almost automatic. Perhaps most importantly, FSU’s payment environment is now more secure – card data never touches their servers, and the incidence of human error has dropped thanks to better training and an intuitive system. This fictional scenario illustrates how applying the criteria above in a real selection process can lead to a solution that balances security, functionality, and cost, ultimately supporting the university’s mission.
Vendor Evaluation Checklist: PCI-Compliant Payment Solution Features
When evaluating vendors, use a checklist to compare how each candidate meets critical requirements. Below is a summary of features and questions to guide your assessment:
- PCI DSS Level 1 Certified: Is the provider audited to PCI DSS Level 1? Do they appear on card brand lists of compliant service providers? (Yes/No)
- Proof of Compliance: Will the vendor provide an up-to-date Attestation of Compliance (AOC) or ROC report? Do they maintain compliance continuously and share updates? (Yes/No)
- Data Security Measures: Does the solution use P2PE encryption and tokenization to protect cardholder data? Is card data kept off your university systems? (Yes/No – list which measures)
- Integration with Campus Systems: Can the solution integrate with your SIS/ERP (e.g. Banner, PeopleSoft), online payment portals, and other campus systems? Are connectors or APIs available? (List integrations or methods provided)
- Reporting & Reconciliation: What reporting tools are included? Can you get department-level reports and automate reconciliation with finance systems? (Yes – dashboards/reports provided; or No – limited reporting)
- User Training: Does the vendor offer initial and ongoing training for university staff? Are there user guides, knowledge base, or webinars for education? (Yes – describe training; or No)
- Ease of Use: Is the interface user-friendly and appropriate for non-technical staff? (Consider testing this during demos.) (Score 1-5 or subjective feedback)
- Vendor Support: What is the support availability (24/7, 9-5, etc.)? Do you get a dedicated account manager? Are they experienced with higher ed clients? (Describe support model and hours)
- Compliance Assistance: Will the vendor help with PCI compliance tasks like SAQ completion or audit prep? Do they provide guidance on new PCI requirements? (Yes/No – note specifics)
- Contractual Clarity: Does the contract delineate the vendor’s responsibility for PCI controls and require them to maintain compliance? (Yes/No)
- Incident Response: In case of a data breach, does the vendor have a plan to notify and assist you? Do they carry breach insurance or liability in contracts? (Yes/No – details)
- Cost Structure: Is pricing transparent? List the fees (transaction %, monthly, setup, etc.) and note if things like support, training, or updates cost extra. (Summarize cost model for comparison)
- References/Track Record: Have you spoken to references or researched the vendor’s reputation, particularly with other universities? (Notes on feedback)
Use the above checklist to score each vendor. You might create a table with vendors as columns and criteria as rows, checking off which requirements are met. The goal is to have a clear, side-by-side comparison of how each solution measures up in the areas that matter most. This structured approach will make the selection process more objective and aligned with your university’s priorities.
Figure: Example vendor comparison on key criteria. Vendor B (blue) scores higher across most PCI compliance and integration criteria than Vendor A (orange), indicating a better fit for a university’s needs (Alt text: A bar chart comparing two vendors across criteria like security, integration, reporting, training, support, cost, showing Vendor B outperforming Vendor A in most categories).
Conclusion
Choosing a PCI-compliant payment solution for a university is a complex decision with far-reaching implications. By focusing on the key criteria – from PCI Level 1 certification and security features, to integration and reporting, to support and training – campus decision-makers can systematically evaluate which solution will best protect their institution and serve its community. Always remember that PCI compliance is an ongoing commitment, not a one-time project. The right payment partner will not only provide a secure platform but also help your university maintain compliance as standards evolve and your campus grows. In our PCI audit readiness blog, we stressed the importance of preparation and partnership in tackling compliance challenges. The same holds true when selecting a vendor: do your homework, ask the tough questions, and choose a provider that aligns with your university’s goals and values.
By investing the effort now to pick a truly capable, higher-ed-focused PCI compliance solution, you set your institution up for success. You’ll gain peace of mind knowing that payment data is secured by a trusted partner, and you’ll free up your staff to focus on strategic initiatives rather than chasing compliance issues. In the end, the best payment solution is one that not only processes transactions, but also becomes a long-term ally in your university’s financial and security ecosystem. Here’s to a future of smooth, secure campus payments and sustained PCI compliance.
For further reading, be sure to check out our main guide on PCI compliance in higher education and our other insights on PCI best practices and audit preparation. By following expert guidance and learning from peer institutions, your university can confidently navigate the vendor selection process and make a decision that stands the test of time.
Empower Your Business
Drop us a line today!
